| Contrast ratio | 38720:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | |
| Submitted | 07 Apr 2014 19:53 CEST, by 87.97.*.* |
| Camera model | Canon PowerShot SX220 HS |
| Processing remarks | Warning: image file 1: Underexposed. Please increase the shutter time. |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 0 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 0 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –12.97 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 3.02 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.403 x 0.403 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 2 ISO: 100 F-number: 3.1 Focal length: 27.9 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 2 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 20 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 5 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –1.64 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.39 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.403 x 0.403 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/30 ISO: 400 F-number: 3.1 Focal length: 27.9 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 2 |
![[open image]](upload/cr030/07550a.jpg){kind=link}
![[open image]](upload/cr030/07550b.jpg){kind=link}
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.