Contrast ratio | Test results | LCD test | Small-screen tests | Lagom home

Contrast ratio results for Horize w650sr from Logical Blue One

Contrast ratio 469:1 (edge: 589:1)
Monitor model Horize w650sr from Logical Blue One
Submitted 07 Mar 2014 12:05 CET, by 122.104.*.*
Camera model Nikon COOLPIX L310
Processing remarks

Warning: image file 1: automatic white balance can cause inaccuracies.
Warning: image file 2: automatic white balance can cause inaccuracies.
Warning: image file 3: automatic white balance can cause inaccuracies.
Warning: Image F-number settings are not the same.

Black
Screen photo
[open image]
Luminance 0.41 cd/m2
Luminance spread 0.12 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations)
Exposure value –1.65 stops   (aim for –2 to –3)
Exposure spread 0.42 stops
Area used for calculation 0.361 x 0.361
Camera settings Exposure time: 1/10   ISO: 6400   F-number: 3.1
Focal length: 25 mm   (35 mm equivalent)
Exposure compensation: 0
White
Screen photo
[open image]
Luminance 191 cd/m2
Luminance spread 18 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations)
Exposure value –1.08 stops   (aim for –2 to –3)
Exposure spread 0.14 stops
Area used for calculation 0.361 x 0.361
Camera settings Exposure time: 1/400   ISO: 6400   F-number: 8.7
Focal length: 25 mm   (35 mm equivalent)
Exposure compensation: 0
Black at screen edge
Screen photo
[open image]
Luminance 0.33 cd/m2
Luminance spread 0.08 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations)
Exposure value –1.66 stops   (aim for –2 to –3)
Exposure spread 0.37 stops
Area used for calculation 0.361 x 0.361
Camera settings Exposure time: 1/8   ISO: 6400   F-number: 3.1
Focal length: 25 mm   (35 mm equivalent)
Exposure compensation: 0
{adcode}

The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.

Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.