| Contrast ratio | 1604:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | |
| Submitted | 22 Nov 2013 08:41 CET, by 122.170.*.* |
| Camera model | Canon EOS 1100D |
| Processing remarks | Note: image file 1: suggested exposure time: 3.0 s (Set EV to -1.0) |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 0.2 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 0.15 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –1.47 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 1.14 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.393 x 0.442 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 6.2 ISO: 400 F-number: 4 Focal length: 28.3 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 319 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 35 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.08 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.16 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.503 x 0.566 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/395 ISO: 400 F-number: 4 Focal length: 36.2 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
![[open image]](upload/cr028/07027a.jpg){kind=link}
![[open image]](upload/cr028/07027b.jpg){kind=link}
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.