| Contrast ratio | 564:1 | 
|---|---|
| Monitor model | Asus VE228H | 
| Submitted | 31 May 2011 00:18 CEST, by 74.13.*.* | 
| Camera model | Nikon E2200 | 
| Processing remarks | image file 1: Note: image seems to be noisy. Try reducing the ISO setting or increasing the exposure time. | 
| Black | |
| Screen photo |  | 
| Luminance | 0.37 cd/m2 | 
| Luminance spread | 0.08 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) | 
| Exposure value | –2.36 stops (aim for –2 to –3) | 
| Exposure spread | 0.3 stops | 
| Area used for calculation | 0.52 x 0.52 | 
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1.5   ISO: 200   F-number: 2.6 Focal length: 36 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 1.7 | 
| White | |
| Screen photo |  | 
| Luminance | 211 cd/m2 | 
| Luminance spread | 56 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) | 
| Exposure value | –2.8 stops (aim for –2 to –3) | 
| Exposure spread | 0.39 stops | 
| Area used for calculation | 0.52 x 0.52 | 
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/127   ISO: 50   F-number: 2.6 Focal length: 36 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: -1.3 | 
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.