| Contrast ratio | 5:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | huion |
| Submitted | 07 Jan 2022 07:45 CET, by 186.72.*.* |
| Camera model | Canon EOS 60D |
| Processing remarks | Warning: image file 1: camera was zoomed in too much. |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 202 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 661 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –3.75 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 4.25 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 0.5 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/80 ISO: 100 F-number: 6.3 Focal length: 79.1 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 982 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 916 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –0.5 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 1.46 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 0.5 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/80 ISO: 100 F-number: 4.5 Focal length: 58.8 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.