| Contrast ratio | 1:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | |
| Submitted | 16 Apr 2016 09:39 CEST, by 176.102.*.* |
| Camera model | Nikon E8800 |
| Processing remarks | Warning: image file 1: automatic white balance can cause inaccuracies. |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 789 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 1232 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.38 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 3.02 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.674 x 0.379 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/119 ISO: 50 F-number: 4.5 Focal length: 35 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 993 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 1331 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –1.49 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 2.34 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.506 x 0.506 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/102 ISO: 50 F-number: 4 Focal length: 35 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| Black at screen edge | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 4923 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 10682 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.02 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 4.25 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 1 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/182 ISO: 50 F-number: 8 Focal length: 253 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.