| Contrast ratio | 755:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | HP LP3065 |
| Submitted | 25 Nov 2008 23:19 CET, by 85.225.*.* |
| Camera model | Pentax K200D |
| Processing remarks | Note: image file 1: suggested exposure time: 2.1 s (Set EV to +1.0) |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 0.23 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 0.08 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –3.54 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.54 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.375 x 0.422 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1 ISO: 400 F-number: 3.5 Focal length: 27 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 170 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 17 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –1.62 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.15 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.375 x 0.422 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/200 ISO: 400 F-number: 3.5 Focal length: 27 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.