Contrast ratio | 818:1 (edge: 386:1) |
---|---|
Monitor model | |
Submitted | 05 Sep 2013 06:53 CEST, by 47.16.*.* |
Camera model | Canon EOS 60D |
Processing remarks | Note: image file 3: suggested exposure time: 0.6 s (Set EV to -1.0) |
Black | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 0.59 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 0.6 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –2.55 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 1.61 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.874 x 0.983 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1.3 ISO: 400 F-number: 4.6 Focal length: 62.9 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
White | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 486 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 108 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –1.88 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.32 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.874 x 0.983 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/395 ISO: 400 F-number: 4.6 Focal length: 62.9 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
Black at screen edge | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 1.26 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 0.49 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –1.47 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.57 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.874 x 0.983 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1.3 ISO: 400 F-number: 4.6 Focal length: 62.9 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.