| Contrast ratio | 1151:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | |
| Submitted | 12 Nov 2012 23:29 CET, by 99.237.*.* |
| Camera model | Canon PowerShot S95 |
| Processing remarks | Warning: image file 2: exposure time below 1/500 sec is unreliable. Try increasing the EV compensation. |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 0.3 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 0.05 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –3.5 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.25 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.396 x 0.396 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/4 ISO: 400 F-number: 2 Focal length: 27.4 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 348 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 55 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –1.61 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.23 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.396 x 0.396 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/636 ISO: 400 F-number: 2.8 Focal length: 27.4 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
![[open image]](upload/cr023/05832a.jpg){kind=link}
![[open image]](upload/cr023/05832b.jpg){kind=link}
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.