| Contrast ratio | 251:1 | 
|---|---|
| Monitor model | |
| Submitted | 27 Aug 2012 15:20 CEST, by 114.76.*.* | 
| Camera model | Canon EOS 5D Mark III | 
| Processing remarks | image file 1: Note: image seems to be noisy. Try reducing the ISO setting or increasing the exposure time.  | 
| Black | |
| Screen photo | 
      
       | 
| Luminance | 1.31 cd/m2 | 
| Luminance spread | 2.06 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) | 
| Exposure value | –2.38 stops (aim for –2 to –3) | 
| Exposure spread | 3.07 stops | 
| Area used for calculation | 0.324 x 0.364 | 
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/4   ISO: 800   F-number: 4 Focal length: 23.3 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0  | 
| White | |
| Screen photo | 
      
       | 
| Luminance | 329 cd/m2 | 
| Luminance spread | 97 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) | 
| Exposure value | –1.79 stops (aim for –2 to –3) | 
| Exposure spread | 0.43 stops | 
| Area used for calculation | 0.324 x 0.364 | 
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/664   ISO: 800   F-number: 4 Focal length: 23.3 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0  | 
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.