| Contrast ratio | 43:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | |
| Submitted | 24 Dec 2010 05:27 CET, by 92.47.*.* |
| Camera model | Nikon D90 |
| Processing remarks | image file 3: Note: image seems to be noisy. Try reducing the ISO setting or increasing the exposure time. |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 5 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 5 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.06 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 1.58 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 1 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 0.3 ISO: 400 F-number: 5.6 Focal length: 75 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 230 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 51 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.39 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.32 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 1 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/180 ISO: 400 F-number: 5.6 Focal length: 75 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| Black at screen edge | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 145 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 206 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.06 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 2.57 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 1 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/90 ISO: 400 F-number: 5.6 Focal length: 75 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.