| Contrast ratio | 79:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | nec |
| Submitted | 19 Sep 2010 00:35 CEST, by 95.18.*.* |
| Camera model | Nikon D200 |
| Processing remarks | Warning: image file 1: automatic white balance can cause inaccuracies. |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 9 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 11 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –1.33 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 2.29 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.5 x 0.561 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1.6 ISO: 200 F-number: 9 Focal length: 36 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 680 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 1595 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.17 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 4.25 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 0.967 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/50 ISO: 140 F-number: 10 Focal length: 147 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: -2 |
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.