| Contrast ratio | 902:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | |
| Submitted | 15 Sep 2022 00:07 CEST, by 73.131.*.* |
| Camera model | Canon EOS 2000D |
| Processing remarks | Warning: image file 1: camera was zoomed in too much. |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 0.29 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 0.06 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.54 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.3 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 1 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 4 ISO: 400 F-number: 5.6 Focal length: 88.7 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 260 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 127 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.69 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.72 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 1 x 1 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/250 ISO: 400 F-number: 5.6 Focal length: 85.5 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
![[open image]](upload/cr074/18579a.jpg){kind=link}
![[open image]](upload/cr074/18579b.jpg){kind=link}
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.