| Contrast ratio | 879:1 |
|---|---|
| Monitor model | xg2401 |
| Submitted | 20 Nov 2019 20:36 CET, by 94.54.*.* |
| Camera model | Canon PowerShot A590 IS |
| Processing remarks | Note: image file 1: suggested exposure time: 4.0 s (Set EV to +1.3) |
| Black | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 0.13 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 0.05 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –3.84 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.63 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.495 x 0.495 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1.6 ISO: 200 F-number: 2.6 Focal length: 34.3 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
| White | |
| Screen photo |
|
| Luminance | 111 cd/m2 |
| Luminance spread | 22 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
| Exposure value | –2.4 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
| Exposure spread | 0.29 stops |
| Area used for calculation | 0.495 x 0.495 |
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/202 ISO: 200 F-number: 2.6 Focal length: 34.3 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
![[open image]](upload/cr055/13835a.jpg){kind=link}
![[open image]](upload/cr055/13835b.jpg){kind=link}
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.