| Contrast ratio | 391:1 | 
|---|---|
| Monitor model | Philips Brilliance 200W | 
| Submitted | 24 Feb 2009 02:45 CET, by 86.145.*.* | 
| Camera model | Canon PowerShot S3 IS | 
| Processing remarks | image file 2: Note: image seems to be noisy. Try reducing the ISO setting or increasing the exposure time.  | 
| Black | |
| Screen photo | 
      
       | 
| Luminance | 0.26 cd/m2 | 
| Luminance spread | 0.08 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) | 
| Exposure value | –2.59 stops (aim for –2 to –3) | 
| Exposure spread | 0.47 stops | 
| Area used for calculation | 0.513 x 0.513 | 
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1   ISO: 400   F-number: 2.7 Focal length: 35.5 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0  | 
| White | |
| Screen photo | 
      
       | 
| Luminance | 101 cd/m2 | 
| Luminance spread | 15 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) | 
| Exposure value | –2.64 stops (aim for –2 to –3) | 
| Exposure spread | 0.21 stops | 
| Area used for calculation | 0.513 x 0.513 | 
| Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/403   ISO: 400   F-number: 2.7 Focal length: 35.5 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0  | 
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.