Contrast ratio | 655:1 |
---|---|
Monitor model | |
Submitted | 22 May 2018 20:57 CEST, by 90.228.*.* |
Camera model | Canon EOS 1000D |
Processing remarks |
|
Black | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 0.76 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 0.25 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –1.78 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.47 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.404 x 0.455 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1 ISO: 400 F-number: 3.5 Focal length: 29.1 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
White | |
Screen photo |
|
Luminance | 499 cd/m2 |
Luminance spread | 81 cd/m2 (2 standard deviations) |
Exposure value | –1.05 stops (aim for –2 to –3) |
Exposure spread | 0.23 stops |
Area used for calculation | 0.404 x 0.455 |
Camera settings | Exposure time: 1/395 ISO: 400 F-number: 3.5 Focal length: 29.1 mm (35 mm equivalent) Exposure compensation: 0 |
The luminance values in cd/m2 are not very reliable, since camera sensitivities can easily differ up to 50% from their nominal value. Typically, the real luminance is 30% lower than this number. The area used for calculation is chosen such that it corresponds to a viewing angle of ±14° horizontally and ±10.5° vertically, which is equivalent to viewing the screen from a distance of about 1.5 times the diagonal size.
Unfortunately, there is a lot of variation in how cameras use EXIF settings. If photos from your camera your produce unusable results, try coming back in a few days. I review submitted pictures regularly and try to fix problems.